Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Vac Rental | E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Unregulated banks

September 8, 2013 - Harry Eagar
In the New York Times, Gretchen Morgenstern has an interesting suggestion -- pierce the veil behind unregulated lenders (in this case, a financial corporation operating under Indian law on a reservation with, it is safe to say, no financial experts in its structure) to learn who's really behind it.

There's a lot of it going around. The Times is among several papers to have called attention to the way the biggest banks put money into questionable microlenders operating among the poorest of the poor, so while the Rez may not be implicated in the bulk of abusive lending, the problem is a big one.

Followers of RtO may want to read the whole thing, because, as so often happens in good print journalism, there's a nugget way, way down in the story. This goes to the phony claim that the CRA (and not a market failure) was behind the crash of '08. Morgenstern is an expert on the subject, one of a handful of reporters who saw it coming and published stories that were ignored in the frenzy to make easy money. So her passing remark carries weight:

"The funding arrangements used by Western Sky and Cash Call are reminiscent of what occurred in the recent mortgage mania. The most egregious predatory lending wasn’t done, for the most part, by big national banks. It was done by smaller subprime mortgage companies like New Century, NovaStar and Fremont General, which made thousands upon thousands of loans.

"But these companies wouldn’t have been able to make even 100 loans had they not gotten the money they needed from the big Wall Street banks. The warehouse lines of credit provided by those banks, therefore, enabled the underwriting of billions of dollars in dubious mortgages. Without access to that money, most of the worst loans would not have been written. When Wall Street cut off the credit spigot, these companies folded almost overnight."

 
 

Article Comments

(8)

OneAikea

Sep-09-13 7:36 PM

johnmichaelgault. You must be a doppess since being a pot calling the kettle black. "[an] ineffectual observer who is of little help." I look forward to your comments. Entertaining.

Are you a regular user of Golytely? Seems you need the prep. To get rid of bile and the nastiness when one is irregular.

OneAikea

Sep-09-13 7:20 PM

Duck is the word, johnmichaelgault. Called a pun when dealing with a quack. Duct or you may get a hit on your head.

Seems the CEO of Production Services Hawaii Inc. gets paid well, annually.

johngault

Sep-09-13 5:55 PM

Hey doppess its called duct tape, unless you are taping your duck cutouts into your junior workbook at day camp.

Again you show off your ignorance, so do not take my word, just order the annual reports for the top ten or more non-profits (health,hunger, Red Cross, etc...) and you will learn just how under informed you are.

You can reply with all the bile and nastiness you

want to, but you are still totally clueless in regards to CEO reumeration.

Party on doppess.

OneAikea

Sep-09-13 5:43 PM

Seems Michael you names a few and only a few but there are more than that in America. "a charity group" I said. You named several. So. Which charity group am I talking about? Which CEO makes less? Based on what, johnmichaelgault?

OneAikea

Sep-09-13 5:34 PM

You seem to be stuck under duck tape. Adhesive tape has transparency. What say Michael?

OneAikea

Sep-09-13 5:29 PM

I don't need to use Wikipedia since you do it for me. Since you use Wikipedia and it proven in the past that you only use what your one sided arguement and since there is two sides to anything, you already lost. You always asking questions where you should always know the answer.

Hey johngault of Kona. Prove your two cent comment with facts. Did you copy and paste that from Wikipedia? If you did where are your quotation marks since you plagiarise and the comment is not your original thought. Prove that all charity groups follow your so called assumptions.

johngault

Sep-08-13 6:13 PM

HEY DOPPESS,again you spout off without the any knowledge of what a non-profit can CEO earn. Do your homework and inquire what the CEO of the AHA,MDA,Komen Foundation,American Cancer and others earn annually. They all must annal issue reports and make this info available to anyone that asks.

By the way they and other junior level workers often receive bonuses.

For someone who calls for thinking out of the box you you are still stuck under the adhesive tape that seals the play dough

Wikipedia is not going to save you, so do some real research and look up these reports.

Party on doppess.

OneAikea

Sep-08-13 3:56 PM

In anything, those with money pull strings. Big banks, bank on the little banks for tax exemptions for losses.

Wondered why a charity group, CEO makes thousands of dollars while workers volunteer for free. Profit companies CEOs make diddly compared to share holders. Non-profit CEOs make less than diddly.

 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web
 
 

Blog Links